Volume 4, Issue 4 (10-2025)                   JRHMS 2025, 4(4): 28-36 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghanbari A, Ashkani S, Ghanbari Talab M, Naderi Lordejani M, Ghanbari M H. The relationship between metacognitive strategies and emotional intelligence with students' academic achievement. JRHMS 2025; 4 (4) :28-36
URL: http://jrhms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-174-en.html
1- Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran.
2- Hakim Toos Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Psychology, Farhangian University, Shahrekord, Iran
4- Elementary School Administration, Lordegan, Iran
5- Farhangian University, Farrukhshahr, Iran.
Abstract:   (1 Views)
Emotional intelligence and metacognitive strategies are among the factors that have a significant impact on students' academic achievement. Given the importance of the subject, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence and metacognitive strategies with mathematics academic achievement in third-grade middle school students. To conduct the present research, a sample of 112 male students from the third grade of middle school in Lordegan County was selected through simple random sampling. The research instruments included the Bar-On Emotional Intelligence Test (2005), the Dawson and McInerney Metacognitive Strategies Questionnaire (2004), and the second semester mathematics score. The research design was correlational. Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression were used for data analysis. The research findings showed that there is a significant positive relationship between students' academic achievement in mathematics and metacognitive strategies (p < 0.01). Students' academic achievement in mathematics also has a significant positive relationship with some components of emotional intelligence (p < 0.01). The planning variable from the metacognitive strategies components is the strongest predictor, and the self-control variable from the emotional intelligence components is the weakest predictor of academic achievement in mathematics. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that metacognitive strategies and emotional intelligence are effective factors for improving and enhancing students' academic performance in mathematics.
Full-Text [PDF 282 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal Article | Subject: General
Received: 2026/06/27 | Accepted: 2026/07/12 | Published: 2026/08/15

References
1. Zahra Kara K. Investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence components and academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;18(5):38-44. [Persian]
2. Parsa N. Translation of Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence. Tehran: Roshd Publications; 2006. [Persian]
3. Mayer JD, Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In: Salovey P, Sluyter D, editors. Emotional development and emotional intelligence: educational applications. New York: Basic Books; 2003. p. 3-31.
4. Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books; 1995.
5. Nelson D, Low G, Vela R. ESAP emotional skill assessment process: Interpretation & intervention. Kingsville, TX: El Learning System; 2003.
6. Dini F. Investigating the relationship between academic achievement and coping styles with crisis and emotional intelligence among Al-Zahra University students [master's thesis]. Tehran: Al-Zahra University; 2005. [Persian]
7. Parker JD, et al. Academic achievement in high school: does emotional intelligence matter? Personality and Individual Differences. 2004;37:132-1330. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.002]
8. Vela R. The role of emotional intelligence in the academic achievement of first-year college students [dissertation]. Kingsville: Texas A&M University-Kingsville; 2003.
9. Boyle JR. [An analysis of an emotional intelligence skills development training program and student achievement and attention] [unpublished raw data]. Kingsville: Texas A&M University-Kingsville; 2003.
10. Nelson D, Nelson K. Emotional intelligence skills: significant factors in freshman achievement and retention. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. GGO 32375; 2006.
11. Stottlemyer BG. A conceptual framework for emotional intelligence in education: factors affecting student achievement [dissertation]. 2007.
12. Nelson D, Low G. Emotional intelligence skills: significant factors in freshman achievement and retention. 2003.
13. Elkins M, Low G. Emotional intelligence and communication competence: research pertaining to their impact upon the first-year experience. Paper presented at: First Year Experience Conference; February 2004; Addison, TX.
14. Saraf. 2006. [Full reference not provided in original]
15. Akbarzadeh N. Emotional Intelligence based on Salovey and Colleagues' Perspective. 4th ed. Tehran: Farabi; 2009. [Persian]
16. Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979;34:906-911. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906]
17. Beshart MA, et al. Investigating the impact of emotional intelligence on mental health and academic success. Journal of Psychological Sciences. 2006;13(5):26-41. [Persian]
18. Slavin RE. Educational Psychology. Prentice-Hall International; 2006. 18(3):85-96.
19. Seif AA. Modern Educational Psychology. 20th ed. Tehran: Dowran; 2012. [Persian]
20. Wells A. Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford; 2009. p. 1-22. [DOI:10.1080/10615800902833770]
21. Kadivar P. Educational Psychology. 12th ed. Tehran: SAMT; 2009. [Persian]
22. Anderman E, Young A. Motivation and strategy use in science: individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2007;31:811-831. [DOI:10.1002/tea.3660310805]
23. Skitka LJ. Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends justify the means? Value protection model of justice reasoning. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;28(5):452-61. [DOI:10.1177/0146167202288003]
24. Akinb JO. Emotional Social Learning. MacDraw Hill Company; 2008.
25. Geary DC. Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences. 2008;20(2):130-133. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.008]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Health and Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb