دوره 2، شماره 4 - ( 10-1402 )
جلد 2 شماره 4 صفحات 32-29 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Keshavarz M, Mosalanejad L, Rahmanian F. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Education: Balancing Humanism and
Technology in Ethical Frameworks – A Commentary. Journal title 2023; 2 (4) :29-32
URL: http://jrhms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-94-fa.html
URL: http://jrhms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-94-fa.html
رحمانیان فاطمه. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Education: Strategies, Methods, and Techniques: a Commentary Study. عنوان نشریه. 1402; 2 (4) :29-32
چکیده: (17 مشاهده)
Medical education stands at the intersection of tradition and innovation. The explosion of the growth of medical knowledge, the increasing sophistication of health systems, and the advent of a new generation of digital learners who demand instant access, tailored content, and interactive engagement have imposed an unprecedented level of pressure on traditional educational systems [1]. The inherent limitations of patient-based education, including inequity in learning opportunities, ethical concerns, and issues of patient safety, have also highlighted the need for a paradigmatic shift in clinical education pedagogy [2].
To address this paradigmatic shift, this discussion is conducted based on theoretical models of technology-enriched instructional design. In this context, the SAMR model is used as a framework for assessing the level of technology integration in the learning process. The model has four levels: substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition, each of which demonstrates the transformative potential of technology in the learning environment [5].
Additionally, the TPCK model, based on the synthesis of three facets: technology knowledge, pedagogy knowledge, and content knowledge, is employed to study the successful integration of these factors in clinical education [6]. The model enables the identification of the most effective combination for achieving effective and sustainable learning.
The collaborative use of these two models provides a theoretical and practical platform to gain insights into how AI can be integrated into medical education, as well as the groundwork on which cutting-edge and evidence-based educational programs can be built.
Artificial intelligence and its spawn, machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP), have been born not as replacement teachers but as cognitive augmentators and facilitators. AI is able to review vast amounts of educational and clinical data to learn patterns of education, identify gaps in knowledge, and adapt education interventions in real time [3, 7, 8]. This ability is in the vanguard of the movement toward competency-based medical education (CBME), where progression is gauged by the attainment of competence [4].
To address this paradigmatic shift, this discussion is conducted based on theoretical models of technology-enriched instructional design. In this context, the SAMR model is used as a framework for assessing the level of technology integration in the learning process. The model has four levels: substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition, each of which demonstrates the transformative potential of technology in the learning environment [5].
Additionally, the TPCK model, based on the synthesis of three facets: technology knowledge, pedagogy knowledge, and content knowledge, is employed to study the successful integration of these factors in clinical education [6]. The model enables the identification of the most effective combination for achieving effective and sustainable learning.
The collaborative use of these two models provides a theoretical and practical platform to gain insights into how AI can be integrated into medical education, as well as the groundwork on which cutting-edge and evidence-based educational programs can be built.
Artificial intelligence and its spawn, machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP), have been born not as replacement teachers but as cognitive augmentators and facilitators. AI is able to review vast amounts of educational and clinical data to learn patterns of education, identify gaps in knowledge, and adapt education interventions in real time [3, 7, 8]. This ability is in the vanguard of the movement toward competency-based medical education (CBME), where progression is gauged by the attainment of competence [4].
واژههای کلیدی: Artificial Intelligence، Clinical Education، Strategies، Methods، Techniques، Active Learning
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 | این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
