Volume 4, Issue 3 (7-2025)                   JRHMS 2025, 4(3): 48-57 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fathi F, FallahFaragheh A, Nayeb M R, RouhparvarZamin M, Salimi S, Shojaeifar F. Education on Warfarin therapy through social media: A facilitator of INR control in patients with prosthetic heart valves. JRHMS 2025; 4 (3) :48-57
URL: http://jrhms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-164-en.html
1- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Student Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3- Research Center for Nursing and Midwifery Care, Comprehensive Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (1 Views)
Heart valve replacement surgery requires long-term care due to its chronic nature. Warfarin, as the primary post-operative medication, can lead to complications such as bleeding or embolism if there is poor adherence to the treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of social media-based education on the control of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) index in heart valve replacement patients.
This experimental study was conducted on 104 patients under warfarin treatment who underwent heart valve replacement surgery between August 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention group, in addition to routine discharge education, received warfarin-related training via social media for two months and was followed up for an additional two months. The INR index was evaluated before and after the intervention, and data were analyzed using independent T-tests, paired T-tests, and Chi-square tests.
The results showed that there was no significant difference in demographic variables between the two groups. The mean change in INR in the intervention group significantly decreased by -1.27 ± 0.35 after the intervention (P-value < 0.001), whereas this change was not significant in the control group (P-value = 0.18).
Utilizing social media-based education can help improve quality of life and reduce warfarin complications by increasing patient awareness and treatment adherence.

 
Full-Text [PDF 955 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal Article | Subject: General
Received: 2026/06/15 | Accepted: 2026/06/15 | Published: 2026/07/13

References
1. EtemadifarSH S, Masoudi R, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi A, AhmadiA HJZ. Effects of a Designed Discharge Plan on Anxiety and Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Under Valve Replacement going Heart. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2019;8(1):286-99.
2. Gati S, Malhotra A, Sharma S. Exercise recommendations in patients with valvular heart disease. Heart. 2019;105(2):106-10. [DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313372]
3. Jiang Y, Song Y. Analysis of risk factors and intervention strategies for acute kidney injury after cardiac valve replacement. Journal of Inflammation Research. 2023:3523-9. [DOI:10.2147/JIR.S425485]
4. Zhang J, Zhou Q. Effect of Different Nursing Interventions on Discharged Patients with Cardiac Valve Replacement Evaluated by Deep Learning Algorithm‐Based MRI Information. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2022;2022(1):6331206. [DOI:10.1155/2022/6331206]
5. Chambers JB. Valve disease and non-cardiac surgery. Heart. 2018;104(22):1878-87. [DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312455]
6. Duraes AR, de Souza Roriz P, de Almeida Nunes B, Albuquerque FPe, de Bulhoes FV, de Souza Fernandes AM, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin after bioprosthesis valve replacement for the management of atrial fibrillation postoperatively: DAWA pilot study. Drugs in R&D. 2016;16(2):149-54. [DOI:10.1007/s40268-016-0124-1]
7. Shendre A, Parmar GM, Dillon C, Beasley TM, Limdi NA. Influence of age on warfarin dose, anticoagulation control, and risk of hemorrhage. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2018;38(6):588-96. [DOI:10.1002/phar.2089]
8. García-Sempere A, Hurtado I, Bejarano D, Santa-Ana Y, Rodríguez-Bernal C, Peiró S, et al. Group-based trajectory models to assess quality of INR control and its association with clinical outcomes. Medical Care. 2020;58(4):e23-e30. [DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001253]
9. Shikdar S, Vashisht R, Bhattacharya PT. International normalized ratio (INR). 2018.
10. Baysal E, Midilli TS. Effects of structured patient education on knowledge level and INR control of patients receiving warfarin: Randomized Controlled Trial. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018;34(2):240. [DOI:10.12669/pjms.342.14216]
11. Vianna MS, da Silva Praxedes MF, de Araujo VE, Ferreira CB, de Sousa WJFN, Viana CC, et al. Self-report instruments for assessing adherence to warfarin therapy: a systematic review. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2021;77(12):1765-81. [DOI:10.1007/s00228-021-03168-z]
12. Mayet AY. Patient adherence to warfarin therapy and its impact on anticoagulation control. Saudi pharmaceutical journal. 2016;24(1):29-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.005]
13. Al-Saikhan F. Warfarin therapy adherence and health-related quality of life among patients using warfarin in Saudi Arabia. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;23(3):398-407. [DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_608_18]
14. Rahmani P, Guzman C, Kezouh A, Blostein M, Kahn SR. Association between patient knowledge of anticoagulation, INR control, and warfarin-related adverse events. Journal of Pharmacy Technology. 2016;32(4):150-9. [DOI:10.1177/8755122516644622]
15. Çınar F, Yalın H, Aslan FE. Investigation of Education Requirements of Individuals Using Warfarin and Achievement of Target INR Value. 2021.
16. Ciminelli JT, Love T, Wu TT. Social network spatial model. Spatial statistics. 2019;29:129-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.spasta.2018.11.001]
17. Heidari M, Sarvandian S, Moradbeigi K, Akbari Nassaji N, Vafaizadeh M. Comparing the effect of telenursing and education without follow-up in the caregivers of heart failure patients on the self-care behavior and clinical status of heart failure patients. Hayat. 2017;23(1):44-58.
18. Alcázar B, Ambrosio L, editors. Tele-nursing in patients with chronic illness: a systematic review. Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra; 2019.
19. Björck F, Kadhim H, Själander A. Predictors for INR-control in a well-managed warfarin treatment setting. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2019;47(2):227-32. [DOI:10.1007/s11239-018-1765-4]
20. Price EL, Ansell J. Virtual education for patient self-testing for warfarin therapy is effective during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2022;48(4):214-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.01.001]
21. Souza-Silva MVR, Domingues MLP, Chagas VS, Pereira DN, de Sá LC, Almeida MSS, et al. Implementation of a text messaging intervention to patients on warfarin therapy in Brazilian primary care units: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):54. [DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01647-5]
22. Zhu Z, Li C, Shen J, Wu K, Li Y, Liu K, et al. New internet-based warfarin anticoagulation management approach after mechanical heart valve replacement: prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23(8):e29529. [DOI:10.2196/29529]
23. Wang C, Luo J, Zhou X, Guo Y, Cao W, Zhang D, et al. Evaluation of a pharmacist-led patient-self-testing model for warfarin management in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ open. 2026;16(2):e105575. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105575]
24. Guede-Fernández F, Silva Pinto T, Semedo H, Vital C, Coelho P, Oliosi ME, et al. Enhancing postoperative anticoagulation therapy with remote patient monitoring: A pilot crossover trial study to evaluate portable coagulometers and chatbots in cardiac surgery follow-up. Digital Health. 2024;10:20552076241269515. [DOI:10.1177/20552076241269515]
25. Hou H, Yue A, Hao X, Yang L, Xue Y. Related factors and safety of reaching the therapeutic target of warfarin after heart valve surgery in hospitalized patients: A retrospective cohort study. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2024;29(2):40. [DOI:10.3892/etm.2024.12790]
26. Mousavi Ganji SM, Karimi M, Yazdi A, Ebrahimi A, Shirsalimi N, Ghomi F, et al. Machine learning-based models for predicting warfarin maintenance dose and investigating factors affecting INR status in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A cross-sectional study. Discover Medicine. 2025;2(1):158. [DOI:10.1007/s44337-025-00389-4]
27. Oh EM, Lee OS, Jang BM, Park S, Cho EJ, Kim KS, et al. Effect of post‐operative anticoagulation management in patients who have undergone On‐X mechanical heart valve replacement surgery on post‐discharge warfarin therapy. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2020;45(4):767-73. [DOI:10.1111/jcpt.13164]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research in Health and Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb